By Jonathan Friedman
Associate Editor
March 10, 2016 -- In reaction
to an emotional and heated meeting last month in Malibu, Laurie Lieberman,
president of the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District board, proposed
the board should adopt a policy regarding civility.
“Everybody has a First Amendment right, and we’re not going
to be able to shut anybody down,” Lieberman said at the board meeting
last Thursday.
She continued, “I do think it’s appropriate for us to say
what we think should be the norms of how we treat each other and how we
talk to each other.”
Lieberman said a good model would be the policy adopted by the Santa
Monica City Council in 2011 that lists six behaviors people attending
meetings should “strive for.”
Among the behaviors included in council's policy are “treat everyone
courteously,” “listen to others respectfully” and “exercise
self-control.”
Several board members agreed with Lieberman, including Richard Tahvildaran-Jesswein,
who said he “did feel uncomfortable” at the meeting in Malibu.
At that Feb. 4 meeting, teachers union president Sarah Braff said she
was verbally attacked by parents and members of an activist group over
a dispute on environmental issues at Malibu High School, according to
an article in The Malibu Times.
Lieberman, who did not attend the meeting in Malibu, said there have
been uncivil school board sessions in Santa Monica as well.
Jose Escarce said he supports a civility policy, but would also like
to have something applying to board members' behavior.
“It’s also uncivil for us to pretend to be listening [when
being addressed by members of the public] while we are texting and talking,”
Escarce said.
Superintendent Sandra Lyon told Escarce that rules regarding board
behavior specifically would have to be a part of a separate policy.
She told the board she would provide them with meeting civility policies
from other governments so they can get an idea of what the district could
adopt.
Also at the meeting, Board member Craig Foster said he wanted to develop
a uniform standard for how school staff members are addressed by name,
especially in front of students.
Foster said there is an unofficial hierarchy system in which janitors
and related staff are called by their first names and teaching assistants
by a title with their first names, while teachers and administrators are
addressed with a title and their last names.
“This is fundamentally in opposition to our core values and reinforces
a hierarchy that we don’t believe exists,” Foster said.
He added, “The more you think about it, the less you’re going
to feel comfortable with it.”
A few board members said they agreed with Foster that the status quo
made for an inappropriate hierarchy, although they also questioned how
an official policy against it could be enforced.
“I think it will be widely flouted because it will be unenforceable,”
Escarce said. “It does run the risk that people will think the board
is being silly, sort of like ‘what the hell are they talking about.’”
Lyon will discuss this issue with the district union heads.
|