|
Search | Archive | Columns | Special Reports | The City | Commerce | Links | About Us | Contact |
Candidate Profiles -- Laurie Lieberman |
|
October 14, 2010 -- The Lookout Staff submitted questionnaires to the 23 candidates running for seats on the City Council and Board of Education. The candidates were given the same timeframe to answer the questions and were limited to 150 words per answer. During the next several days, the Lookout News will publish the candidates’ answers verbatim. The profiles for the four-year City Council race will be published first, followed by the two-year City Council race and lastly the Board of Education race. They will appear in alphabetical order based on the candidates’ first names. Name: Laurie Lieberman Why are you running for office and why should residents vote
for you? Sheila Kuehl and Julia Brownley endorse me because they know I combine experience with an understanding of the challenges that face our schools. I hope to bring leadership that makes a real difference in the lives of children. I have the ability and the wherewithal to help our District obtain greater financial resources and build coalitions that will help realize excellence and equity. Do you have any children attending SMMUSD schools or who graduated
from SMMUSD schools? What has your specific involvement been with the
school district? Since my children entered kindergarten, I have been active in our schools. As an elementary school parent, I volunteered in classrooms, ran the book fair and participated in PTA activities. In middle school, I continued to participate in PTA activities, and became active in District-wide funding measures. This year is my third on Samohi’s PTA Executive Board. As an Athletics Booster Club member and Choir Board member, I actively support high school athletics and the music program. My recent leadership roles include co-chairing the Samohi Coalition and LEAD. I was also instrumental in developing the advisory measure (YY) for the City’s use tax (Y) that was ultimately supported by the education community and placed on the November ballot by the City Council. How would you rate the current Board of Education? What particular
decisions stand out for you that made you form that opinion?
Special education: The Board was slow to respond to parents who raised issues about our approach to special education, including forced confidentiality clauses. Not only were special education families harmed; the District’s reputation in the community and its partnership with the City were damaged. Civic Center Joint Use Project: The Board should have played a more active and visible advocacy role supporting this outstanding project, working alongside parents who secured the City’s $57 million allocation to it. Securing local sources of funding: The District’s approach to private fundraising will be addressed in the coming months. While the SOS, Measure A and Y/ YY campaigns demonstrate the vitality of parent leadership in school funding campaigns, Board involvement should provide credibility in the community and hopefully, valuable guidance What would you as a member of the Board of Education do to get
the District through these tough economic times? Through passage of local funding measures like Measures Y and YY, contracts with city governments and leasing of surplus property, we need to be ever-creative in identifying new local resources and open to outside-the-box ideas. The District must also work with Statewide education organizations to prevent further cuts in public education funding. As the economy recovers, we need to find ways to enhance funding for California’s chronically underfunded public schools. The discussion that has begun about how to expand and potentially re-structure the District’s approach to private fundraising should be open and thoughtful. How would you rate the current status of the District’s
special education department? Are there still improvements that must be
made? The District needs to continue to improve communications with special education parents so that we can further reduce litigation. Perhaps most importantly, the school community must start from the premise that special needs children (like all children) can learn, that we should have high expectations, set standards, and work to help our children succeed in meeting them. The Board of Education will be selecting a person to replace
Superintendent Tim Cuneo, who is retiring in June. What are the qualities
you want for a new superintendent? The superintendent’s leadership skills must include the ability to inspire, teach, facilitate, motivate, collaborate and engage with staff, the Board and the Superintendent’s leadership team. S/he must show leadership by creating conditions that encourage teachers, the senior cabinet and other administrators and all staff to grow and learn and become leaders themselves. Leadership must include support for collaboration among the District’s constituents in pursuing the District’s mission of “creating extraordinary achievement for all while simultaneously closing the achievement gap.” The new superintendent should be an open and effective communicator. This will be necessary for developing strong partnerships with the cities of Santa Monica and Malibu, Santa Monica College, the business community and community non-profit institutions. It will also be important in instilling trust and confidence among the superintendent’s leadership team, staff, parents and Board members. If elected, what are your ideas for closing the achievement
gap in the SMMUSD?
A working group should be created to ensure that we have the right pieces and that they work together. What is the greatest book ever written? |
Copyright 1999-2010 surfsantamonica.com. All Rights Reserved. |