District Officials Unveil Special Education Plan
By Teresa Rochester
For years the school district's special education department has been
a hotbed of controversy and the brunt of criticism. At Thursday night's
Board of Education meeting, district staff unveiled an ambitious million-dollar
roadmap aimed at moving the department forward.
The plan -- which includes, among other things, increased staffing, bringing
currently outsourced services in-house and reliving overcrowded special
education classrooms -- was crafted by district employees Rose Ecker and
Laurel Schmidt, who were charged with turning around the department in
May of 1999.
Ecker told the board that the plan for the 2000-2001 school year will
run the district $4.85 million in general fund money -- a $1.126 million
increase in the department's current budget.
"We've had a very difficult time," Ecker said. "I think,
looking at our vision, it's a very important piece. The money will help
us do our job better. The budget we proposed includes the new staffing
and transition from outsourcing. We were told the local general fund contribution
was way too large. Laurel and I are standing firm."
The plan specifically calls for:
· In September 2000, align special education programs at all sites
and open new classes to relieve overcrowding.
· Beginning in September 2000, provide comprehensive occupational
and physical therapy services at school sites and at the district clinic,
using district personnel. The clinic was completed in February 2000. The
district would also have to hire three full-time occupational therapists
and a supervisor. The staff report states that the current cost to outsource
the services costs the district $438,344. Moving the service in-house
would cost $223,474 and the district would save $214, 870.
The report states that the move would allow the district to "more
effectively monitor progress, insure compliance regarding the frequency
and quality of service and monitor costs associated with these services."
· Beginning in September 2000, establish a facility to provide
comprehensive services related to autism and communication disorders.
The number of autistic students in the district leapt from 26 in 1998-1999
to 54 this year. The proposal calls for services to be administered at
one location and initial steps would include two pre-school classrooms,
support staff and facilities and behavior intervention services, which
are frequently provided for autistic students. The district could potentially
save $172,070 moving the service in-house.
· Add support to provide specialized services within the district.
This proposal calls for the district to hire a district reading specialist
and a full-inclusion specialist, who would work with severely challenged
students entering general education classrooms. Currently one full-inclusion
specialist for one child runs the district $11,700; an in-house specialist
serving multiple schools and students would cost $53,000.
· Add speech pathologist. Current speech staff is currently overburdened
with up to 55 cases -- the maximum allowed by the state and their contracts.
"Overloading creates delays in assessments and compliance issues,"
the staff report states.
· Adding to central staff. The department's six-member team lost
two members, forcing those who remained to pick up their work load, a
move which has sapped the time office staff spent working directly with
families, teachers, administrators and site teams. Special education employees
in district headquarters also run student services.
Superintendent Neil Schmidt unveiled a plan to establish a new assistant
superintendent of student services and special education, a position that
is usually reserved for larger school districts. Schmidt urged the board
to think outside the box on the matter and to move quickly. The board
will discuss the proposal at its next meeting.
"I think we are at a juncture where we need to take a very hard
look at not only our plans with the children but also with staff,"
said Schmidt, who is no relation to Laurel. "I think from an organization
point of view this is the next step. It's a big jump and it may be viewed
as top heavy. I don't view it as top heavy."
Board President Todd Hess expressed concern about the cost of the proposal,
while other board members and community members praised the plan saying
it was a long time in coming.
"I think we'd be remiss if we didn't mention that this proposal
would commit 25 to 30 percent of all additional revenue to one part of
our budget and I personally feel uncomfortable with that," said Hess.
"I want the board members to step up to the plate and give special
education an extra hand," said Linda Saffin, whose son Alec is an
11th grader at Santa Monica High School. "You have a real opportunity
to do a really honorable thing for all students in the district."
"I'm strongly supportive of this," said board member Dorothy
Chapman. "It doesn't seem like we're rushing. To me it's been a three
year process, with last year being the most painful. We need to be assertive
to put together a full team."
Last year the district received particularly harsh criticism from parents
of special education students when media outlets reported that district
officials blamed special education for the district's financial wows.
The public pummeling led to the hiring of Ecker and Laurel Schmidt to
turn the beleaguered department around.
In October of 1999 the pair held two workshops to gauge the needs of
special education parents and teachers. What they found was a culture
of distrust, frustration and non-compliance along with overcrowded classrooms,
piecemeal services, high turnover and little ongoing training.
Schmidt described to the board the immediate changes implemented by the
pair, including intensified recruiting (using the term Special Education
by the Sea to attract prospective teachers), ongoing training and support
-- including a support group for new teachers, workshops on special education
law and focus groups with parents.
"The process of being at these focus groups was very rewarding ,"
said Schmidt. "It was an amazing process. It's not done. This is
just phase one."
|